Perverse Cosmic Myopia

This is a global crisis, and a core lesson of the Great Depression is that a global crisis calls for a global response. As such, Tim Geithner and Larry Summers are preparing for the upcoming G-20 summit with an agenda that has the merit of actually addressing the problem at hand: coordinate global stimulus, strengthen the International Monetary Fund, preserve open trade. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Mar 20, 2009 - 7:37 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Mar 20, 2009 - 7:37 AM PDT
Gary Clark
3.0
by Gary Clark - Mar. 20, 2009

Brooks points out that American citizens' outrage over bonuses is a distraction (but symbolic). Although he casts foreigners as being in precarious situations, many of their economies are not as shot through with fraud, and some have nationalized banks for strict controls we do not have. He may be correct that the G-20 is headed for impotence, because Europeans want no more of our exported fraud. Hence their emphasis on long-term architecture, and international regulations Brooks derides. His call for more IMF and World Bank dominance is more of the failed investor class policies. But that's Brooks' own myopia from New York.

David Brooks is a beltway politico pundit, has little insight to offer on economics, and his smugness closes avenues of discussion.

“Even this is not the most idiotic of the distractions. For that, you have to look abroad.” and “They’ve got Jean Monnet on the brain.” More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Fabrice Florin
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Mar. 20, 2009

A reasonable reminder that we need to focus more on the urgent global financial crisis than the minor issue of AIG bonuses, despite the American public's recent outcry. The author points out that the crisis is much more severe outside America, and that our failure to implement a long-range global rescue plan and financial architecture could lead to disastrous results. This opinion is thoughtfully presented, with logical arguments and factual evidence to support its points.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Mar. 20, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Information
3.0
Insight
3.5
Style
4.0
Context
3.5
Enterprise
3.5
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!