MRI Lie Detection to Get First Day in Court

Defense attorneys are for the first time submitting a controversial next-generation lie-detection test as evidence in U.S. court. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Mar 17, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Mar 17, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.7
by Derek Hawkins - Mar. 17, 2009

A balanced story. Wired explains the science behind the fMRI, weighing the potential uses against scientific and ethical questions about the machine.

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
3.8
by Kenneth Sibbett - Mar. 17, 2009

90 percent? Screw the other ten percent. Off with their heads. This article is well written and sourced, by opposing sources. You're going to put someone in prison with so may differing opinions? Sleep tight!

I would dare this company to take this test to a prison, and test it on psychological liars, murderers, and serial killers. I doubt it would even work on trained soldiers.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Peter L. Combs
3.9
by Peter L. Combs - Mar. 17, 2009

Good story, loads of experts, nice depth, explains the pros and cons and hopes for the science. Explains it might be useful in court at some point or under certain circumstances.

As for me..a 90% accuracy isn't great, an electronic gadget should never be used as the detyrmining factor when dealing with someones freedom or life. When it reaches the accuracy of DNA we can talk more.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Walter Cox
4.4
by Walter Cox - Mar. 17, 2009

What if one could, with 100% accuracy, determine the truthfulness of human testimony? All of criminal justice would change radically, and probably for the better. This article effectively introduces new technology that may lead to the fulfillment of this 100-year-old dream.

See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
3.3
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.2
Sourcing
3.7
Style
4.2
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!