Voting technology facts fight conspiracy theories

Election technology should be studied by unbiased scientists, whose voter registrations shoud be disclosed. Instead of reverting to paper ballot systems, legislators and officials should focus on finding modern technology to administer elections. Otherwise, our elections will be vulnerable, not to imaginary techological glitches, but to human nature. Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: Election Reform
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Mike LaBonte - Mar 14, 2009 - 8:25 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Mike LaBonte (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Mike LaBonte - Mar 14, 2009 - 8:25 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Mike LaBonte
1.9
by Mike LaBonte - Mar. 14, 2009

This briefly highlights two quotes from one election official to prove that electronic voting is better than paper. The source is linked. No substantiation is provided for the claims in this story.

The article is deceptive in stating that unbiased scientists should study voting technology, disregarding that many have. And it doesn't help the author's credibility that she chose to back up her post with quotes from an election official.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

1.9

not enough reviews
from 1 review (10% confidence)
Quality
2.0
Information
1.0
Insight
2.0
Style
2.0
Context
1.0
Enterprise
1.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
1.5
Recommendation
1.0
Credibility
2.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!