It presents opposing perspectives excellently.

It manages to distill the current, quite legitimate arguments on each side into understandable language. However, it does ignore the 'refugee problem' - displaced Palestinians in refugee camps who aren't welcome in other Arab nations, and Jews from Arab nations displaced by the same wars who settled in Israel and don't want to go back. At the time of the wars, there was almost an equal 'exchange of populations'. That's changed, of course. And it mentions, but tiptoes around the violence between Fatah and Hamas.

it maintains a nonpartisan, nonfingerpointing point of view, which is required to educate those who feel one party or the other in this conflict is the injured innocent while the other is absolutely guilty.

Quite interesting. Certainly a number of issues are to be found in seeking a solution to the Israel/Palestine problem.

Writing an article in interview form of two people arguing is like showing a video of bullies in the grammar school pushing each other around. It's boring and you get nothing from it.

This article comprises "hundreds of hours of candid discussions" that in IMO accurately reflects what Israelis and Palestinians experience and/or discuss. It doesn't attempt to argue any points. It just shows an accurate portrayal how many Israelis and Palestinians perceive the historic conflict.

this is good reporting, the words of real operatives, with real substance