The Neocons Strike Back

What the successful neocon campaign against Freeman also showed was that there is little media power at the national level to defend a public figure who comes under sustained assault of this type. Several articles defending Freeman appeared on the Internet, and the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity published a supportive letter, but those efforts paled in comparison to the neocon barrage. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Media
Member Tags: AIPAC, isreal
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Mar 11, 2009 - 5:05 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Mar 11, 2009 - 5:05 PM PDT
Fabrice Florin
1.5
by Fabrice Florin - Mar. 12, 2009

Robert Parry is a notoriously partisan journalist, who tends to present a biased view of the stories he covers, often presenting his own opinions as facts. This particular opinion piece is no exception.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Rebecca Hale
4.2
by Rebecca Hale - Mar. 12, 2009

"The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views … and the ... More »

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.5
by Dwight Rousu - Mar. 12, 2009

Parry puts the AIPAC dictation of Obama appointees into the context of the long range strategy of the neocons to control the U.S. media and the U.S. Intelligence function for the service of right wing and right wing Israeli aims.

Realism requires being critical of the Israeli war crimes in Gaza.

By using their media platform to launch the assault that kept “realist” Freeman out of the National Intelligence Council, the neocons brought together two central ... More »

See Full Review » (15 answers)
James Canning
4.9
by James Canning - Mar. 12, 2009

Superb commentary by Robert Parry, in the wake of the Aipac/Israeli militarist triumph over Chas Freeman. The connection between the neocons (who include many rabid "supporters" of Israel) and the promoters of gargantuan US "defense" spending is made clear, with the skewing of intelligence to enlarge the trough from which the "defense" establishment feeds.

The neocons and the Israel lobby brought us the Iraq War catastrophe, and of course they are pushing hard for an even greater disaster, fomenting an attack on Iran. Will "protecting" Israel bankrupt the US? Cause a needless world war? These people are very dangerous indeed, and they receive the full support of the Wall Street Journal, and nearly full support from the Washington Post (though contrary messages get through, in the pages of the Post)

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Information
3.3
Insight
3.8
Style
3.8
Context
4.2
Enterprise
3.8
Expertise
3.2
Originality
3.8
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help