The Right to Food: Corporate, Foreign Gov't Land Grab Causing Hunger in Poor Countries

(Multimedia) The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Olivier de Schutter, joins us to discuss his recent warning that some 500 million small farmers in poor countries are suffering from hunger, partly because foreign countries and corporations have bought up large tracts of land. We're also joined by Smita Narula, author of a new study suggesting that many of the land deals in Africa and South Asia lack transparency and could threaten local ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu - via David K. Miller (t), Alex Williams (f), Gian Antelles (f)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Business, Living
Stats Help
# Tweets: 0 (as of 2010-10-28)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Oct 28, 2010 - 7:57 AM PDT
Content Type: Multimedia
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Oct 28, 2010 - 10:23 PM PDT
Dwight Rousu
4.0
by Dwight Rousu - Oct. 28, 2010

A food story with ties to global economy power, corrupt governments selling off land for personal profit, population growth, global climate change, which is all too much to get into one segment of a show. It is a good top level summary of an underreported problem.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Warrior Wheatman
3.8
by Warrior Wheatman - Oct. 29, 2010

Mid-East and European money is finding safe-haven in Third-World farmland. UN report to be released chides host governments for lack of oversight of evictions of many thousands of villagers.

Thanks to ownership of automated factories, millions of jobs are exterminated. Now, hand-pushed carts must compete with factory-farm trucks, delivering food and bio-fuel to international markets.

the Pakistani government last year announced that it would make over 2.4 million hectares of land available to foreign corporate investment in agriculture. One farmers’ ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!