Discusses women's lives without interviewing women. I understand why he could not interview Farid's wives, but were there no other women he could interview? I suspect their views might be different and worth reading - perhaps they would touch on safety/security/economics as possible motivations, for example. Or not - my point is just that we have no idea, because they aren't in here, as Fairweather is obviously aware. Moreover, the only two countries discussed in any detail are war-torn - surely this context matters. Finally, the video doesn't seem to square very well with the article - for example, the article ends with a mention of what Farid wants for his sons, whereas the video ends with him saying he wants his _children_ to be educated and have the freedom to make their own choices. The article doesn't also square that well with itself - for example, the article says" women are clearly treated as commodities, with little say in whom they marry" but the video suggests that at least a dozen women are exercising some agency, if they are calling Farid and asking him to take them on as wives. I am making no comment about the possibly problematic nature of this agency, only pointing out something that I found confusing.