Could Customized Newspapers Bring Readers Back?

A big newspaper company wants to give you news the way Burger King makes hamburgers: your way. MediaNews Group, the nation’s fourth-largest newspaper chain, said it would test a customized newspaper service this summer at The Los Angeles Daily News, one of the 54 dailies owned by the company. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Mar 9, 2009 - 12:29 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Mar 9, 2009 - 12:29 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.3
by Derek Hawkins - Mar. 9, 2009

Shorter than it should have been. I could see this leaving a lot of readers confused about the potential benefits and drawbacks of the customized newspaper model.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dan Kennedy
3.1
by Dan Kennedy - Mar. 9, 2009

Though the story rightly calls into question the notion of a print-on-demand news service, the reporter should have further explored the feasibility of customers' paying for a tailored, curated news report.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fred Gatlin
2.3
by Fred Gatlin - Mar. 9, 2009

The key to good journalism is in the second paragraph. “This organization is the fourth largest newspaper chain”. This trial will not work.

Are this people as stupid as they look?

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
2.9
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 9, 2009

Not much a report on this idea. Published in the Times, the value add should be access to experts or industry leaders, or deep data analysis. This piece has neither.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Ian Cerveny
3.4
by Ian Cerveny - Mar. 10, 2009

There is definitely some bias in the presentation of the service provided. The author is clearly against this method for news publication.

What a ridiculous waste of resources. I can't see this venture succeeding beyond a very limited audience.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.9
Facts
3.6
Fairness
2.8
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.8
Style
3.2
Context
2.5
Depth
1.8
Enterprise
2.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!