Public Opposes Troop Surge by 61% to 36% Margin

The poll finds that only 12% opt for a troop increase using the traditional four-alternatives question, little changed from past polling. But the poll included a separate question that summarized a possible "surge" announcement, and found that 36% support the idea of such an increase, while 61% oppose it. Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S.
Topics: War in Iraq
Member Tags: anti-surge, Air Force Times
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Jan 9, 2007 - 5:05 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: David Patterson - Jan 10, 2007 - 8:07 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Michael D. Lowe
2.8
by Michael D. Lowe - Oct. 1, 2008

Waste of time. This is not straight reporting. It uses a current as a starting point then using slight of hand & poor questionaire design "seems" to arrive at a conclusion. Bottom line: Don't bother reading it.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Joseph F Dunphy MBA MFP
2.6
by Joseph F Dunphy MBA MFP - Oct. 1, 2008

First, the raw material is excellent, in that there was a large sample of more than 1,000 people randomly selected. But what the author does with this great material is itself debatable, as the graphics totally undercut the spin of the story. The chart shows that only 18 percent of people interviewed with this question strongly support a surge in troops--meaning that as much as 82 percent are actually against the surge, with a swing of persuadables of only 18 percent. The key weasel word in the question is "temporary," which is undefined, but thanks to leaks over the weekend, we now know that the new generals in charge think that the "surge" will last as long as two years--invalidating both the term temporary and surge. None of ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Leo Romero
5.0
by Leo Romero - Oct. 1, 2008

As well as reporting how Americans feel about a troop increase, shows how poll results vary greatly, depending on how the question is asked. Free access expires 1/9/7.

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Marty Heyman
3.9
by Marty Heyman - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a well written report from the polling organization itself. It is well written and complete in its presentation of the poll.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
David Patterson
3.0
by David Patterson - Oct. 1, 2008

Somehow I knew this already without a new poll. The President will ignore this poll as well as the last election which said the same thing.

See Full Review » (3 answers)
Gene Fire
3.5
by Gene Fire - Oct. 1, 2008

This is only stating the obvious.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Don Wicks
1.0
by Don Wicks - Oct. 1, 2008

The fact is that all polls are based on written questions by a person or persons with a goal in mind for the answers they want. To do so they are carefully written to guide the answers to their predetermined conclusions. These people are smart and are often paid by those with a desire for the right conclusions. As such most polls are trash and the answers are used to form a particular goal - political, business, personal, etc. To use one poll or a dozen polls may be popular with the public, but far more important to the people paying for them. There should be a disclaimer regarding political matters identifying the organizations buying them and the political agenda of the writers, i.e, registered Demorat or Repluicrat, etc.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.8

Average
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.7
Facts
3.0
Fairness
2.4
Information
2.8
Sourcing
3.6
Style
2.5
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.8
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
4.6
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!