Some GOP critics of omnibus love their earmarks

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) and other Republicans are drawing criticism for sponsoring hundreds of millions of earmarks in the $410 billion omnibus that they themselves have blasted as fiscally irresponsible.

Vitter is the most obvious target because he holds himself a fiscal conservative, a position that often serves him well. In the midst of a heated debate over earmarks, however, Vitter finds himself ducking charges of hypocrisy.

The ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero

See All Reviews »

Review

Lynn Caporale
3.7
by Lynn Caporale - Mar. 9, 2009

It is important to point out that Republicans are taking earmarks even while they criticize the Democrats for them, but much better would be a story that presents specific information on the history of earmarks, dating back at least 2 decades. In particular, how have earmarks been introduced over that time period? What percent of the appropriations bill have earmarks represented across that time period? What changes in how earmarks are introduced, voted on, and their source identified [or not] over that time period? How has the nature of earmarks changed [e.g. road to a shopping mall built by a big donor to a specific congressman vs. equipment for a city's planetarium].

If you look in the dictionary under the definition of hypocrisy, there will be a picture of a Republican talking about earmarks.

See All Reviews »

Lynn's Rating

Overall
3.7

Good
from 6 answers
Quality
3.8
Facts
4.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
3.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
More How our ratings work »