Dealing with Hamas: Can the U.S. Avoid It Much Longer?

The formation of that Lebanese government, of course, sealed the defeat of the Bush Administration's efforts to stand up a pro-Western government in Beirut that excluded parties allied with Syria and Iran. The U.S. strategy foundered on the fact that Hizballah and its allies enjoy wide backing in the communities from which they hail and have the military muscle to back them up in a fight. London has simply acknowledged that Hizballah is an intractable ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Mar 6, 2009 - 12:29 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Mar 6, 2009 - 12:29 AM PST
Dwight Rousu
4.4
by Dwight Rousu - Mar. 6, 2009

Karon seems here to be one of those realists working in the news business. He looks at the international and U.S. evolving positions on the treatment of Hamas, and the productivity of demonization versus engagement.

The U.S. government has been supporting a murderous bully state. The Palestinians have been supporting anybody willing to kick the bully where it hurts. Winning hearts and minds includes constraining bullies and murders whether they are an official state or a popular resistance movement. Evenhandedness is overdue.

The U.S.-led boycott of the organization in the hopes of promoting peace with the Western-backed moderate Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is looking ... More »

See Full Review » (15 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 7, 2009

This piece looks at US - Palestinian policy from a realpolitik perspective. There's good information paralleling British policy, and a good articulation of the sticking points with Hamas.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Mar. 6, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Mary Chamie
4.7
by Mary Chamie - Mar. 7, 2009

This is a more open perspective that is difficult to find in the American press. I believe that we will not move forward until we actually listen through good journalism to all sides and learn to mediate our judgements rather than to simply selectively listen to certain groups while ruling out all listening or discussion with those who disagree with our main political point of view. This type of objective journalism is mandatory if we are ever to get out of this mess and approach a peaceful settlement. It should be pointed out that in order to be published, even this article had to be presented with a constant negative tone toward Hamas (including the photo) rather than an objective one that might consider why it was ever ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)
harold resnick
4.1
by harold resnick - Mar. 7, 2009

You observe & write about the world in a realistic manner.

Obviously I have some personal points of view & realize that the problems can not be settled for my opinion,that's not realistic.Compromise of some sort has to take place so that each side gets part of theor wants.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.2
Information
4.6
Insight
5.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.5
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.2
Depth
2.8
Enterprise
4.8
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!