Canadian Oil Sands

Once considered too expensive, as well as too damaging to the land, exploitation of Alberta's oil sands is now a gamble worth billions.

Nowhere on Earth is more earth being moved these days than in the Athabasca Valley. To extract each barrel of oil from a surface mine, the industry must first cut down the forest, then remove an average of two tons of peat and dirt that lie above the oil sands layer, then two tons of the sand itself. It must heat several barrels of water to strip the bitumen from the sand and upgrade it, and afterward it discharges contaminated water into tailings ponds ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Dwight Rousu
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Mar. 4, 2009

The destruction of the northern Alberta environment to feed the U.S. addiction to oil is presented in a way that shows the scope. The grandeur of the destruction comes across in the article and pictures. The climate change effects story is muted.

Canadian mining interests seem to have political dominance over environmental advocates up north. There seems to be a free market short term profits paradigm operative there, as well as the one that has wreaked havoc here in the U.S.

But the free market does not consider the effects of the mines on the river or the forest, or on the people who live there, unless it is forced to. Nor, left to itself, will it consider the effects of the oil sands on climate. Jim Boucher has collaborated with the oil sands industry in order to build a new economy for his people, to replace the one they lost, to provide a new future for kids who no longer hunt ptarmigan in the moonlight. But he is aware of the trade-offs. “It’s a struggle to balance the needs of today and tomorrow when you look at the environment we’re going to live in,” he says. In northern Alberta the question of how to strike that balance has been left to the free market, and its answer has been to forget about tomorrow. Tomorrow is not its job. 

See All Reviews »

Dwight's Rating

Overall
4.7

Very good
from 14 answers
Quality
4.8
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »