Dirty Coal Has Left the Building

Live Blog from DC

(Blog Post) ...marchers are gathering in the park just to the south of the Capitol, a few blocks from the Capitol Power Plant....chanting "Clean Coal is a Dirty Lie,"... It's an energetic crowd, on a very windy and cold day, though the sun keeps attempting to break through... Carl "Pete" Ramey, a great-grandfather from Wise County, Virginia, and VFW chaplain, who spent 37 years laboring in an underground mine, has just read an opening prayer: "Is faith asleep? Let it ... Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington

See All Reviews »

Review

Beth Wellington
4.5
by Beth Wellington - Mar. 3, 2009

Jeff Biggers is also the author of the United State of Appalachia and has written for a variety of sources such as the WaPo and Atlantic. He paints a vivid picture of the action, describing it, the reasons behind it and highlighting some of the folks involved. The next best thing to being there. While I "somewhat" trust HuffPo, I trust this author. In the links there, I've also included the coverage from Ken Ward, Jr. which gives a really full picture of coal in general, as well as Bill McKibben's op-ed from the WaPo. I've also posted a piece in the NYT blog dot.earth and the comments attached discussing whether scientists should be involved in advocacy.

While Pelosi and Reid announced that the acting Architect of the Capitol will be looking into a conversion to natural gas, this is not the ideal solution for several reasons. NG is also a fossil fuel, in limited supply which emits carbon (although less than coal) and has its own set of problems involved in its drilling and transportation. Also, a change to NG requires retrofitting. If we're going to the expense, why not model options such as demand reduction, solar hot water and geothermal? I also linked to a fact sheet on liquefied natural gas, which is footnoted with sources. I also have a March 2 article by NewsTrust member Christopher Mims on geothermal from from SciAm.

See All Reviews »

Beth's Rating

Overall
4.5

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.6
Information
4.0
Insight
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »