Member of UN Environment Panel Warns Greenhouse Emissions Rising at Alarming, Unexpected Rate

We speak to Chris Field, a leading member of the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, about his warning that the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is rising more rapidly than expected in recent years. Field says the current trajectory of climate change is now much worse than the IPCC had originally projected. On Wednesday, Field told a Senate panel droughts caused by global warming could make parts of the American ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Politics, Sci/Tech
Topics: Global Warming, United Nations, U.S. Senate, Climate Change
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Feb 26, 2009 - 9:29 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Feb 26, 2009 - 9:29 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.9
by Dwight Rousu - Feb. 26, 2009

The interview lets you listen to Field himself. The role of skeptics and lobbyists is touched upon.

We need worldwide reductions in human population.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Norman Rogers
1.0
by Norman Rogers - Feb. 27, 2009

This is seriously garbled. Goodness only knows what they mean to say. If CO2 emissions are increasing by 3.5% per year it is not reflected in the atmosphere. According to the CO2 measuring station on Mauna Loa, Hawaii CO2 in the atmosphere increased from 368 to 385 parts per million from 2000 to 2008, a rate of 0.5% per year. The rate of increase for the previous 10 years from 1990 to 1999 was 0.4%. So there was a 20% increase in the rate of CO2 added to the atmosphere, not 3-1/2 times or more as stated in the story (3.5% instead of less than 1%). The greenhouse effect of CO2 is logarithmic meaning that a 20% increase causes only a 10% warming. Thus slight accelerations of the rate of increase are less important than you might think.

Silly unscientific climate alarmism.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.7
Information
3.7
Sourcing
5.0
Style
4.5
Context
4.5
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!