The Bigger Questions - Science Careers

Prather says that as one of two minority female faculty members in her department, she is sought out by students from underrepresented groups. She frequently participates in programs aimed at reaching these students. Indeed, the opportunity to reach out to women and minority students--and teach them--was among the factors that drew her back to academia. "I really felt like, if it was just about research, I could do that at other places. But teaching ... Full Story »

Posted by Tamika Thompson

See All Reviews »

Review

Kevin Barry
3.6
by Kevin Barry - Feb. 27, 2009

A fairly enlightening article that covers two points: the benefical experiences of a researcher having gone both through the industry and academia and how she found her way to her calling (engineering as a means to apply technology, rather than simply discover it), and the barrier faced by minorities and women in many science and engineering fields. Regarding the latter point, the article would have been benefitted from exploring this issue further (although it links to a survey on the topic from 2007). Overall, an informative read, and I would highly recommend this to any high-school or college student exploring career options (primarily for the insight on the large range of areas Prather explored).

Being a software engineer, I am well aware of the lack of female and minority representation in the field. The linked survey sheds a little light on why this is. In many ways, it's circular; minority students see few others in the field, much less in faculty positions, so they shy away. Minority faculty members, similarly, feel isolated (few minority students and fellow faculty) and limited by office politics, meaning that few decide to progress. The bigger challenge is in finding out ways to help prospective students fight through these barriers and follow through on a career they will otherwise enjoy and thrive in.

See All Reviews »

Kevin's Rating

Overall
3.6

Good
from 11 answers
Quality
3.5
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.0
More How our ratings work »