Franchise Fraud: Wake Up and Smell the Fine Print

Franchising—in which a firm lets independent businesspeople market and distribute goods or services in its name—certainly has its benefits. It lets the franchisor expand its market while spreading risk around, and small investors can capitalize on a proven business model. But neophyte businesspeople may not be in the best position to judge that model before committing their life savings. According to Texas franchise lawyer Richard Solomon, fraud has ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Business
Topics: U.S. Economy
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Feb 25, 2009 - 1:50 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Feb 25, 2009 - 1:50 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Feb. 26, 2009

While clearly defending the apparently defrauded couple, Mother Jones serves up a fine feature story that was informative and brought me palpable outrage over the franchise dispute discussed in it. This is a great public interest story, fine muckraking.

Shining example of my favorite type of news story.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Glenn LaBauve
4.6
by Glenn LaBauve - Feb. 26, 2009

Hidden nightmares nearly always lead to new insight.

Had there been an adequate federal regulatory body or if the victims had had the foresight to have an independent accountant or lawyer review and evaluate the business and the agreement, much of this could have been averted. In any given year I will do a few such evaluations, and with few exceptions, the model previewed by the offeree has little if any relation to reality. Some are still good once the pie in the sky is taken out, but some don't even need an indepth evaluation to ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Brian Bucknam
3.5
by Brian Bucknam - Feb. 26, 2009

Interesting story about the perils of neophyte businessmen joining a franchise. It is worrying that the side-bar about legal fees says "In civil court, the law almost never requires a losing party to cover the winner's legal costs" in contradiction to many legal agreements I have seen.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.7
Information
4.7
Sourcing
3.3
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!