Called back to Africa by DNA

More African Americans are seeking dual citizenship and reconnecting with their ancestral homelands thanks to increasingly sophisticated technology.

His desire to reach out to Africa took off after his Jewish elementary school teacher told him about her people's quest to return to their homeland and introduced him to the writings of Malcolm X, he said. For years, he spent weekends poring over genealogical records in search of his roots. In what he calls a life-altering experience, he took a DNA test last spring and was told he shared ancestry with the Tikar, Hausa and Fulani peoples in Cameroon. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

Review

Tamika Thompson
2.6
by Tamika Thompson - Feb. 23, 2009

One of the reasons that there is so much interest among African Americans in the type of DNA tests mentioned in this article is that the reporter often covers a famous African American person (in this case, Isaiah Washington) who takes a DNA test to find out which African nation his/her ancestors inhabited. The problem with this article and with others is that very little care is given in explaining that the DNA results are not necessarily accurate. Just one paragraph out of this 41-paragraph article mentions that the test results might not be accurate. From Los Angeles Times "Called back to Africa by DNA": "He argues, however, that the global database of African genetic profiles is too small to be able to pinpoint the exact country of origin. Rick Kittles, African Ancestry's scientific director and University of Chicago associate professor of medicine, counters that his proprietary database is large enough for accurate testing." While it is fine to report on the phenomenon of African Americans attempting to reconstruct their identities through DNA tests, the article must better explain just how controversial these tests are and how much debate there is around them.

See All Reviews »

Tamika's Rating

Overall
2.6

Average
from 19 answers
Quality
2.5
Facts
2.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »