Doctor's Orders?

Critics of comparative effectiveness research, which the government has been funding for decades, claim that it will lead to treatment being approved or denied based on costs. Proponents say it will improve the quality of care and can, in some cases, show that more costly treatments aren't as effective as less expensive alternatives.

We can't predict what will happen in the future, but we can say that several claims being made about the impact of ... Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte

See All Reviews »

Review

Fabrice Florin
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Mar. 2, 2009

Excellent reporting on claims made by Betsy McCaughey and Rep. Tom Price about health care provisions of the new stimulus law passed by Congress. The author provides a detailed analysis of these claims, and debunks them one by one, based on extensive factual evidence from multiple, credible sources.

Kudos to NewsTrust editors Walter Cox, Mike La Bonte, Beth Wellington, Marsha Iverson, Dan Kennedy, Jim Lang and Dale Penn, for diligently researching this story over the past few weeks, reviewing multiple stories from opposing viewpoints, to help us reach an informed conclusion on this topic. This FactCheck article summarizes effectively what we think is a reasonable conclusion on this issue.

See All Reviews »

Fabrice's Rating

Overall
3.9

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »