Doctor's Orders?

Critics of comparative effectiveness research, which the government has been funding for decades, claim that it will lead to treatment being approved or denied based on costs. Proponents say it will improve the quality of care and can, in some cases, show that more costly treatments aren't as effective as less expensive alternatives.

We can't predict what will happen in the future, but we can say that several claims being made about the impact of ... Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte

See All Reviews »

Review

Dale Penn
4.8
by Dale Penn - Mar. 1, 2009

I am so glad FactCheck.org took a hard look at the claims made by some during the stimulus bill debate. This is thorough, factual and unbiased reporting, and an important addition to the legacy of the stories that prompted it.

I must admit that I jumped the gun when I read the original article by Betsy McCaughey and called it a "hit piece," but perhaps my overstating this opinion caused us to delve deeper into understanding where she was coming from. Ironic, no?

See All Reviews »

Dale's Rating

Overall
4.8

Very good
from 12 answers
Quality
5.0
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »