Doctor's Orders?

Critics of comparative effectiveness research, which the government has been funding for decades, claim that it will lead to treatment being approved or denied based on costs. Proponents say it will improve the quality of care and can, in some cases, show that more costly treatments aren't as effective as less expensive alternatives.

We can't predict what will happen in the future, but we can say that several claims being made about the impact of ... Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte

See All Reviews »

Review

Mike LaBonte
4.9
by Mike LaBonte - Mar. 3, 2009

With tons of sources, this article exhaustively analyzes controversial claims regarding the new stimulus bill. Well linked, and very fair in that McCaughey was interviewed to explain her position.

I was one of the people who asked FactCheck to investigate this, because I could not corroborate McCaughey's claims even after looking at the stimulus bill pages she cited. FactCheck went further and got the loose rationale McCaughey was using directly from the author. Not bad.

See All Reviews »

Mike's Rating

Overall
4.9

Very good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.8
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
5.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
5.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »