Contests serve as warning to Democrats: It's not 2008 anymore

Off-year elections can be notoriously unreliable as predictors of the future, but as a window on how the political landscape may have changed in the year since President Obama won the White House, Tuesday's Republican victories in Virginia and New Jersey delivered clear warnings for the Democrats. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Jay Rosen, Washington Post , Memeorandum
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Stats Help
# Tweets: 4 (as of 2009-11-03)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Nov 3, 2009 - 8:59 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Nov 3, 2009 - 8:59 PM PST
Glenn LaBauve
3.4
by Glenn LaBauve - Nov. 4, 2009

too may tea leaf readers and not enough protagonists.

In an age of sensationalism, every writer wants to show that their article is more important than anything else, these are minor occurances, and the real story is the demographic of the voter at the polls.

Off-year elections can be notoriously unreliable as predictors of the future, but … More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Sirajul Islam
3.6
by Sirajul Islam - Nov. 4, 2009

Well, it's a good piece, and timely. Though most voters in both states said in exit polls the election was not a referendum on the Democratic president, the result will certainly send a caution to moderate Democrats nationwide concerned about their reelection chances next year. That could deal a blow to Mr. Obama’s ambitious agenda, foremost healthcare reform and energy legislation, amid continuing high unemployment. The bright spot for Democrats, the party’s candidate won the special election for the House seat in New York’s 23rd district, a takeover of a historically Republican seat was also mentioned. I like it for its objectivity, but I feel the tilt, too. Thanks.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Derek Hawkins
2.8
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Tyler Kane
4.6
by Tyler Kane - Nov. 4, 2009

The story was very good. It approached the subject very factually and had a lot of good information. The subject didn't lean too far on either side, presenting it in a way that both parties could appreciate.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.6
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.6
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.6
Depth
3.6
Enterprise
3.4
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
4.4
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!