The New Filibuster

Kevin Drum raises an important point, namely that “The filibuster was never intended to become a routine requirement that all legislation needs 60% of the vote in the Senate to pass.”

Indeed, the filibuster was never intended at all. A few years into the existence of the U.S. Senate, they undertook a review of their rules. A determination was made that the motion to end debate was unnecessary, so it was removed from the rulebook. The Senators ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: U.S. Congress
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Feb 15, 2009 - 7:45 AM PST
Reviewed by: Leo Romero (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Feb 15, 2009 - 7:45 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Feb. 15, 2009
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.9

not enough reviews
from 1 review (10% confidence)
Popularity
2.9
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!