The Biggest Roadblock to Change May Be in Our Minds

An overlooked component of the health care debate is our tendency to justify the status quo.

When you step back from the specifics of the health care debate — as well as the rancor surrounding it — an odd contradiction emerges.

Fairly or not, insurance companies have traditionally been regarded with a combination of contempt and scorn. Yet the president's proposal to change the nation's system of health care coverage — which would put restrictions on some of the companies' more egregious practices and provide increased competition ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via Miller-McCune
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Nov 3, 2009 - 12:35 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Nov 4, 2009 - 12:37 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.6
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 14, 2009

Some fascinating reporting about the mechanisms in our brain that lead us to accept the status quo, however flawed it may be, as just and good. This looks at the social psychology of health care reform and offers interesting perspective on why some Americans may have so violently rejected it.

people are motivated to justify and rationalize the way things are, so that existing social, economic and political arrangements tend to be perceived as fair and ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.6
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 14, 2009

Thoughtful report on why people tend to cling to the status quo, as seen recently in the health care reform debate. This story cites a study from New York University, which suggests that most people share a "motivation to perceive the status quo as the way things should be." This blog post could have benefited from presenting other viewpoints and different studies from more sources, but its main point is important and explained clearly.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.1
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 14, 2009

The short synopsis of the study is interesting enough to instigate looking at the study and independent replications and variations of it.

people are motivated to justify and rationalize the way things are, so that existing social, economic and political arrangements tend to be perceived as fair and ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Dara Friedman-Wheeler
5.0
by Dara Friedman-Wheeler - Nov. 9, 2009

This piece uses scientific data to bring in a voice that has been missing from the health care debate -- psychological research has much to offer on this topic.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 7 reviews (49% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.1
Fairness
4.1
Information
3.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.8
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.4
Depth
3.2
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.6
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • The Age of Paranoia

    There is profound paranoia on the economic front all along the political spectrum. Conservatives AND liberals feel that bailouts are arranged for the benefit of Wall Street ...
    Posted by Fabrice Florin
  • Why Are the Loudest Political Voices the Most Extreme?

    Those bombastic self-appointed spokespersons who rant from both the political right and left are likely driven by the conviction that their extreme views are shared by the ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • Psychologist Tackles Psychology of Liberals, Conservatives

    Liberals and conservatives conceive of morality in decidedly different ways. Jonathan Haidt has mapped out their competing ethical universes in hopes they can learn to ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala