Three weeks in, and no one has Obama's back

President Obama should get that dog soon. Already, he needs a friend in Washington.

His transition team let him down. So did fellow Democrats who control Congress.

The string of Cabinet nominees with tax problems showcased a lack of proper vetting and an overabundance of arrogance. Either way, it produced a team whose key players are limping rather than leaping onto the field. Some prospective teammates never made it out of the locker room. Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Feb 8, 2009 - 8:20 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Feb 8, 2009 - 8:20 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Marsha Iverson
3.4
by Marsha Iverson - Feb. 8, 2009

Interesting analysis, sharp criticism for the Democrats in Congress, and for now-President Obama. Light on information ABOUT the stimulus package--what is in, what is out, and any economic theory behind it. Relies heavily on the results of one poll to indicate loss of public support for the 'stimulus package,' and blames Obama for not doing a better job of selling the concept to the public.

Interesting that Vennochi does not mention the phenomenally partisan Republican opposition, overt media bias, or the tendency of Congress and pundits to make sure that change cannot happen because they fight tooth and nail to maintain the status quo. The traditional story is that nobody can change the way Washington works--and fault the change agents rather than the inertia of decades of partisan obstruction. We know that reduced corporate taxes got us in to the current situation, ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Patricia Blochowiak
2.5
by Patricia Blochowiak - Feb. 8, 2009

Would be better with some mention of the Republican opposition and the conservative media attacks.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
William Hughes-Games
4.9
by William Hughes-Games - Feb. 9, 2009

Telling it the way it is but hopefully not the way it will be.

The congress hasn't the vision or the gumption to get Obama's back. The only body he can depend on is the people who elected him. When the congress is being obstructionist, voters must pelt their congressmen with letters util they start to think right. Obama can go over congresses' heads in his fireside talks to let the people know what must be done.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Feb. 8, 2009
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Kenneth Sibbett
3.9
by Kenneth Sibbett - Feb. 8, 2009

The author tries to take the pulse of a nation and if she's right the Democrats are on life support. With the stimulus package barely making it out of the Senate, now Obama's got to wait and see how they butcher it in committee.

If Obama doesn't quit kissing the ass of every Republican in D.C., he,s going to have a long FOUR years in the White House.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Norman Rogers
3.3
by Norman Rogers - Feb. 8, 2009

Letting Obama off the hook and blaming it on the other democrats is silly. The "stimulus" bill is highly irresponsible because it has been loaded with useless pork. Right now Bush is looking good by comparison with the 3 stooges: Reid, Pelosi and Obama.

It's apparent that Obama has no idea what to do and it's nuts to leave it to the congress. He has to get his act together soon or he will become a laughing stock.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
2.0
Fairness
1.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.8
Style
3.6
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.4
Depth
1.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
2.5
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
1.0
Responsibility
1.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!