MS Winning Office Doc Battle

"Public administrations and regulated businesses were worried about meeting Freedom of Information requirements if documents were stored in a long-extinct proprietary data format," says John McCreesh, marketing project lead for OpenOffice.org. Full Story »

Posted by Autumn Carlson
Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech
Topics: Computers
Member Tags: imb, open standards, odf, xml, proprietary file formats, office, documents, monopolisation
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Autumn Carlson - Jan 5, 2007 - 5:55 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Jan 5, 2007 - 8:00 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
4.1
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008

A fairly good piece of reporting. However, the title may be a little deceptive, and Gilbertson may not have given enough attention to Microsoft's position in the matter.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Joseph Duemer
4.9
by Joseph Duemer - Oct. 1, 2008

Well-written and informative story. Tech-Business journalism at its best.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Autumn Carlson
4.0
by Autumn Carlson - Oct. 1, 2008

Well-rounded, with quotes and concerns from both sides of the open-source debate.

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Mal Burns
2.6
by Mal Burns - Oct. 1, 2008

Typically, although authoritative, this article ignors a crucial issue also related to freedom of information. It is a simple fact that proprietary file formats are a complete hinderence to productivity unless they offer specific unique features and are universally embraced. One problem lies with the ignorance of users themselves, Unless there is essential cause to open them (in this writer's case with Open Office on both Mac or Windows platforms) most "Doc" files and similar should be aimed at the bin. These days it costs nothing to export or print to PDF, Envoy, Flash Paper, Html (even "txt") or other universal portable formats, most of which are more compact and more easily navigatable than software-specific formats. We need ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
3.5
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.8
Sourcing
4.4
Style
3.5
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
2.5
Context
3.6
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.1
Credibility
4.4
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
4.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!