Student's Free Speech Case May Lead To Legislation

In his ruling on a pioneering Internet free speech case last month, U.S. District Judge Mark R. Kravitz offered something of a plea to higher courts: Revisit the boundaries of free speech for students.

Kravitz was siding with Burlington school administrators accused of violating the First Amendment rights of a student they disciplined for a blog post she wrote off school grounds. And he offered an argument for why, in the Internet age, the old ... Full Story »

Posted by Dale Penn
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dale Penn - Feb 1, 2009 - 11:03 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Feb 2, 2009 - 12:44 PM PST
Derek Hawkins
3.8
by Derek Hawkins - Feb. 2, 2009

Thorough, well contextualized story that uses one case to examine how new laws could allow public schools to extend their reach in regulating student speech. This is a hugely important topic whose impact is not widely understood. The Courant explains it well in this piece, though sourcing could have been broader, and there were a couple quotes that were inconsequential. All around highly recommended.

Small people, terrified that suddenly the playing field is now level, or at least more level than it used to be. Free expression is free expression, and if you're upset that a group you disagree with has a soapbox as big and as free as yours, deal with it. It's an outrage to punish these students and it sets a dangerous precedent for all of us.

“In my view, this is a dangerous approach in a free society to suggest that because communication is easier, we need more censorship and more restriction, rather than ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
3.7
by Patricia L'Herrou - Feb. 2, 2009

the story illustrates the difficulty of keeping up our ability to process the changes brought about by technologies and the rate of such changes. various perspectives are represented here for the question posed with reasonable points made on most of those.

i would tend to judge this differently here than i would if it were not children involved. (teen-agers in my view still need adult guidance and limits)

See Full Review » (11 answers)
U B
3.0
by U B - Feb. 5, 2009

An extremely important issue, presented in a fairly disorganized fashion. For example, Columbine-type situations, which are mentioned at the end of the article, are completely different from situations in which schools are dealing with language or actions that would simply be inappropriate or disruptive had they taken place on school property.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
3.8
by Kenneth Sibbett - Feb. 2, 2009

Ms. Becker writes an article that could stir a bee's nest. Censorship off school grounds is an area that is gray at best.As long as there is no violent intent to anyone, I don't see how you can censor somebody just for being mean to someone. While their are bullies and just plain assholes everywhere, they have a right to speak their minds, even if it is idiotic.

Cyber Bullying is getting to be a major problem, especially in middle and high school.It seems to me this is more of parental problem and a judicel one.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Dale Penn
3.7
by Dale Penn - Feb. 1, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Jessica Yuan
4.6
by Jessica Yuan - Feb. 3, 2009

The use of quotes is very effective. There are numerous quotes that demonstrate that this story was well researched and add credibility.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Ron Denton
4.4
by Ron Denton - Feb. 3, 2009

It presents the very real issue of attempts to control and suppress free speech by agents of a government entity. The story could be better organized, but it does provide a number of good quotes and reference to previous relevant court cases. It also presents both sides of the issue in a pretty even way.

How the speech is transmitted is totally irrelevant. It is being suppressed solely on the basis of its content. The officials are trying to use the fact that the writer is enrolled in a public school system as a basis to censor anything he may say or print in any venue. Didn't we fight this whole issue of students still having rights under the Constitution over 40 years ago.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
David Leyba
3.2
by David Leyba - Feb. 2, 2009

Rather unorganized story. Made it a little confusing to read.

I am amazed that this is an issue. really well thought out: "Off-campus speech can become on-campus speech with the click of a mouse." But the, under that rationalization, anything can easily become on campus speech if you wrote it down and someone else brought it onto the campus. Might as well stop pretending that Constitution applies to students. It's particularly interesting that the speech she was punished for was criticism of the administrators. Granted, it was a little ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Barbara Hipsman
4.2
by Barbara Hipsman - Feb. 2, 2009

Definitely..gets to all sides. This is a topic that will shift and change daily as we have more and more free speech - you can try to control it, but really...school officials have to get thicker skin.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.7
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.0
Context
3.5
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
3.2
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!