Bush Doctrine Stalls Holder Confirmation

Even as Senate Republicans seek assurances that new leaders at the Justice Department will not prosecute former government officials over national security abuses, one of the highest-profile investigations of the Bush era is grinding to a close.

A little more than a year ago, then-Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey handpicked a prosecutor to investigate the destruction of CIA videotapes depicting harsh interrogation tactics used against two ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Jan 24, 2009 - 10:06 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Jan 24, 2009 - 10:06 PM PST
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jan. 25, 2009

Straight forward journalism reporting the facts of the hearings. Republican senators are skirting a knife-edge in their obstructionism about keeping Bushies above the law and withholding support of Obama’s $800 billion help for the economy–especially in light of their behavior of rocketing approval of their $700 billion bailout without a shred of supervision or control.

That Republicans are so worried about investigations that they’re obstructing the appointment of nation’s attorney and are willing to risk the wrath of the American people–already fed up to the eyeballs about the past eight years–is a tacit admission that they consider themselves guilty of criminal behavior and fear justified punishment.

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Marsha Iverson
2.7
by Marsha Iverson - Jan. 25, 2009

Tepid account of GOP intrigue and party politics vs the clear legal obligation to investigate and prosecute suspected criminal behavior under the Bush administration, suggesting that Democrats and "Left-leaning interest groups" favor prosecution while "leading GOP senators...demand that Holder commit to not launching criminal probes against participants and high-level Bush advisers who took part in debates over warrantless wiretapping and detainee interrogations". In the face of recent bold admissions by both George W Bush and Dick Cheney to breaking US and International laws, and disclosures of the scope of illegal communication surveillance on the entirety of all US electronic information, and a federal court decision that ... More »

I would expect all legislators of conscience to be every bit as concerned with holding lawbreakers accountable on either side of the aisle. All have sworn an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, not their party's interests. It isn't optional, and it isn't a matter of jiggering the law to benefit parties or friends or cronies, or partners in crime. For anyone--particularly a senator--to demand that a nominee for attorney general promise NOT to uphold the law is beyond belief.

Congressional Democrats and left-leaning interest groups are calling on the Justice Department to revisit the alleged sins of the past and to provide the public with a ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Jan. 24, 2009
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Kenneth Sibbett
4.1
by Kenneth Sibbett - Jan. 24, 2009

An article that point's out that the new Attorney General can't say what cases he will prosecute. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, it seem to me the Republicans are getting a little nervous.

I read where Cheney dis't Bush about the Libby parole. He better hope the Justice department doesn't procecute him, or he will think Libby got off easy.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.4
Facts
3.5
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.3
Style
3.3
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!