Will Obama keep Britain at bay?

While the US president will take Gordon Brown's calls, the two countries' relationship might not be quite as special

While Obama undoubtedly shares many of Britain's policy aspirations, there are signs he may be less eager to afford Brown a special hearing than was Bush to Blair. For a start, Bush had few real friends in Europe. Inclusive, multilateralist Obama – "no country left behind" – is everybody's best new pal. Europe's leaders are currently queuing to catch reflected glory. Full Story »

Posted by Peter Barnett
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Peter Barnett - Jan 22, 2009 - 6:27 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Peter Barnett - Jan 22, 2009 - 6:27 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Patricia L'Herrou
3.4
by Patricia L'Herrou - Jan. 22, 2009

a very speculative, but interesting opinion piece with not a lot upon which to base the implication of the title that pres. obama could back away from great britain. if he were only comparing a bush/blair relationship to this new era, it makes sense, but he doesn't stop there. he mentions the pres. speech quote "era of responsibility" as potentially extending to all allies.

pres. obama also mentioned , regarding this country, "gov't that works". this may well extend to international alliances that work, which i think likely includes great britain, given the references to gordon brown in this piece.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Randy Morrow
3.4
by Randy Morrow - Jan. 23, 2009

An interesting opinion (written from a British prospective) on where the Britain/America "special relationship" might go under Obama .

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Peter Barnett
4.0
by Peter Barnett - Jan. 22, 2009

It's a well presented opinion.

Opinion is all that it is.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
James Canning
3.1
by James Canning - Jan. 22, 2009

Tisdall suggests Obama might have various reasons not to keep the British connection with America in the most robust condition possible. He suggests that Bush kept the British close, but in fact the Iraq War catastrophe was the direct result of the neocons keeping their British counterparts away from the decision-making. Harold Wilson, of course, had the good sense to rebuff Lyndon Johnson's urgings that the UK join in the US fiasco in Vietnam.

The UK is far and away the most important ally of the US, and any Obama administration dealings with the Middle East should be undertaken in the context of close advice from the British. If Bush had listened to the warnings of numerous British advisers available to him, the Iraq War disaster need not have happened.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.8
Information
3.0
Insight
3.8
Style
3.5
Context
3.8
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!