Israeli forces shell UN headquarters in Gaza

A senior Israeli military officer had also said Israeli troops shelled the compound after coming under fire from Palestinian militants there — an account dismissed by a U.N. official there at the time as "nonsense." Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Topics: War, Middle East, Israel
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Mike LaBonte - Jan 15, 2009 - 8:26 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Mike LaBonte - Jan 15, 2009 - 8:26 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 15, 2009

The standard Israeli claim that atrocities were undertaken because they were fired upon from the site is put forward and dismissed by witnesses at the scene.

The continued assault on the UN seems to show a general intent to attack international bodies who might provide humanitarian aid or give independent witness to the genocide.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
aaron benjamin hutchins
3.4
by aaron benjamin hutchins - Jan. 15, 2009

The article starts out with the attack on the UN food compound, than moves on to the now seemingly required claim that Israel is defending itself (never mind that Israel drew First Blood with the blockade), then finally gets on with the details of what happened at the UN food compound. In passing the end of the article mentions that Israelis struck near yet another UN school. I recommend this story as an example of sly, biased reporting.

As a former Artillery Forward Observer (MOS 13F) I find it hard to believe that Israeli forces, using the latest GPS & targeting technology-and have been given the GPS locations of all UN facilities, are accidentally hitting those facilities. Also, witnesses in those areas counter the Israeli claim that they were being fired at from those facilities, but of course the U.S. Main Stream Media does not consider victims (in this case Palestinians in Gaza) reliable sources of information.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.3
Fairness
3.7
Information
4.3
Sourcing
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.5
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!