Scientific evidence becomes politically fashionable again

Blessed are the geeks, for they shall inherit the Earth

ONE of the stranger beliefs of some politicians is that if they treat nature like a troublesome opponent and ignore it, it might go away and stop bothering them. In the opinion of many scientists George Bush, America’s retiring president, was just such a politician. It would be one thing, for example, to argue that it is too expensive to stop climate change and that adapting to such change is a better course of action. It is quite another, as White House ... Full Story »

Posted by Peter Barnett

See All Reviews »

Review

Marsha Iverson
4.3
by Marsha Iverson - Jan. 10, 2009

Thorough inventory of Bush Administration's penchant for ignoring and suppressing science when inconvenient or disagreeable, elaborated by listing the specialties and research expertise of new Obama appointments and nominees to head critical agencies.

While I don't advocate unfettered use of "science" as an excuse for unacceptable viewpoints or policies ("genetic purity," or meticulously noted experiments with, say, torture), I do firmly believe that it is better to ground policy in fact, to discover accurate answers to significant questions, and learn to adjust policies and priorities based on demonstrable evidence. Perhaps a return to respect for science will lead to better science education, and restore the US capacity for technological innovation and responsible decision-making.

See All Reviews »

Marsha's Rating

Overall
4.3

Good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
5.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »