Why Feinstein broke with Obama on Panetta

Those who know Feinstein well and have worked intimately with her insist that her public critique of Panetta was not personal in nature. Though the two have competed on the political stage - a movement in 1998 to get Panetta to run for governor was derailed largely by rumors that Feinstein would throw her hat in the ring - insiders say that this week's dustup was more a message to the incoming Obama administration about Beltway politics. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - Jan 7, 2009 - 1:48 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Chris Finnie - Jan 7, 2009 - 1:48 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Chris Finnie
4.1
by Chris Finnie - Jan. 9, 2009

What a very polite way of saying she's a stuck-up prima dona and demands to be treated as such. No wonder Marinnucci has lasted so long as a political reporter. If Feinstein didn't want to be seen as weak, she should have tried standing up to Bush a few times. Her constituents in California would be happier with her if she had. Instead, she's commonly called "Lieberman in a skirt" by California Democrats, and narrowly escaped a censure vote by the state party last year.

Dear Diane clearly didn't notice that voters didn't vote for Democrats, but for change in the most recent elections. So she's still playing politics as usual.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
4.2
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jan. 7, 2009

Insightful article that really nails Feinstein. Looks like Republicans aren't the only politicians who didn't get the message voters sent in the last election.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Norman Rogers
2.0
by Norman Rogers - Jan. 8, 2009

Story treats incident as a tactical move by Fieinstein to assert her authority. Could it be that Panetta for the CIA is just a rotten idea? Article does not engage this issue.

Putting a politician in charge of the CIA indicates that Obama does not want objective intelligence, but he wants to control the message to suit his political needs.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Michael James Finn
2.4
by Michael James Finn - Jan. 9, 2009

No. Too many Anonymous sources used by the journalist when they were not talking about anything substantial. I don't want to know what people around her are talking about, I want to know what she meant by it. I would like a comparison of what she is doing now and what she acted like under Bush.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.6
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.4
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!