This piece almost rises to vitriol---written by an U.S. reporter living in Mumbai. Although I have listed it as news analysis, as that is what it purports to be, it has an underlying opinion. What makes it interesting, however, are the links the writer has selected from Indian coverage of Bush over time--on the Indo-US nuclear deal and an interview with Bush by the corporation's U.S. paper, India Abroad. Also interesting are the comments, which reflect the Hindu-Muslim tensions in the country.

Clearer and more careful with words than most, but doesn't bring much new insight to the table.

Apparently this is the first article in a series. No new information seems revealed, though the facts presented look right. The article to this point reflects disaster, but refrains from saying it strongly.

Doesn't really bring an Indian angle Bush's legacy, but is a decent overview of the results of the 2000 election. Part of a series.

This is the first in a multi-part series. It is an overview of the Bush presidency with some interesting links to related material included (e.g. "Why India is upset with George Bush").

While it's a mere recitation of events during the beginning of Bush's term, it'instructive to recall long past events and their relation to one another.

the truth. just the truth. Bush was a failure, the worst President ever.