Factor human rights into Gaza crisis

I am proud of my Jewish heritage. I know that we have been victims just because we are Jewish. But to me, when we say "Never again!" we cannot mean that never again will we accept Jewish suffering. It must mean never again will we permit a people to suffer persecution because of race, religion or ethnic identity.

Today, it pains me to acknowledge, the state of Israel is betraying everything about my heritage in which I take pride. Even more ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: World
Member Tags: war crimes
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Jan 5, 2009 - 4:23 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Jan 5, 2009 - 4:23 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 5, 2009

The opinion represents what seems a wrenching evaluation of his own culture and native land in view of the facts of the present situation. Extremely well written.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Jack Dinkmeyer
3.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jan. 5, 2009

No one does guilt like the Jewish. If they cannot lay it on others, they turn it upon themselves. The "human rights" of this article is how Israel treats Gaza. Thus the title is not an accurate description about what the article is really all about.

Taking sides in this conflict is an exercise in futility. Israel is right; Israel is wrong. Hamas is right; Hama is wrong. The mistake Bush and his ineffectual Secretary of State made was taking sides; Israel against everyone else. To expect objectivity–much less intelligence–from Bushies is truly unrealistic. We shall spend years reaping the wind from this bunch of incompetent foreign relations "experts".

See Full Review » (11 answers)
James Canning
4.6
by James Canning - Jan. 5, 2009

Excellent personal statement regarding illegal and immoral Israeli assault on Gaza, aided and abetted by the US.

The purpose of this murderous assault is to facilitate permanent retention of illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank, contrary to international law and contrary to Israel's own true best interests.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
John Seymour
3.0
by John Seymour - Jan. 5, 2009

The article is written in the typical manner of someone who purports to be Jewish, in order to make what he is saying that much harsher. I'll just give one example. His second point about the 'law of war', repeats the oft-cited specious argument about a proportionate response. It seems this author whould be as upset with the United States for entering WWII after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. I mean, all the U.S. should have done, it seems, was go over there and lob a few ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Information
3.7
Insight
4.0
Style
4.3
Context
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.7
Originality
4.3
Relevance
4.3
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!