Orwell, blinding tribalism, selective Terrorism, and Israel/Gaza

If you see Palestinians as something less than civilized human beings: as "barbarians" -- just as if you see Americans as infidels warring with God or Jews as sub-human rats -- then it naturally follows that civilian deaths are irrelevant, perhaps even something to cheer. For people who think that way, arguments about "proportionality" won't even begin to resonate -- such concepts can't even be understood -- because the core premise, that excessive ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Jan 4, 2009 - 4:06 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Jan 4, 2009 - 4:06 PM PST
Marsha Iverson
4.8
by Marsha Iverson - Jan. 6, 2009

Brilliant, insightful, and to-the-point with the crucial moral questions we must all examine: How do we deal with "the other"?

Our ability to designate anyone as "other" allows us to create barriers and commit unspeakable acts against them, betraying our own humanity by denying theirs. To consider one side (ours) "enlightened" and the other side (theirs) "barbaric" is an untenable failure of reasoning. The new Obama administration must use this opportunity to step in and stop the killing by pressuring Israel to abide by the Geneva Conventions and the Nuremberg Principles.

There are few concepts more elastic and subject to exploitation than “Terrorism,” the all-purpose justifying and fear-mongering term. But if it means anything, ... More »

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 9, 2009

Greenwald incisively analyzes the nationalistic blindness of the Israelis and sympathetic jews to the dehumanized slaughter.

The blindness of nationalistic Americans to American atrocities is a mirror image of blind Israeli/likud jingoism.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
James Canning
4.9
by James Canning - Jan. 6, 2009

Another strong attack on the mindset of those who think killing Palestinians (or Lebanese, or Syrians, or Iranians) is not such a big deal, by Glenn Greeenwald who is always well worth reading. Greenwald in a series of pieces makes a good case that Israel is militarising the US in an effort to allow its own militarised society to continue to oppress the Palestinians.

Israel needs to accept the Arab peace plan and return to its pre-1967 borders. If this requires 100,000 peacekeepers for ten years, that is a better price to pay than endless war (with its risk of an insane Israeli attack on Iran, etc.). Israel is putting its own long-term stability needlessly at risk by oppressing the Palestinians in an insane effort to keep the illegal settlements in the West Bank.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
4.4
by Kenneth Sibbett - Jan. 5, 2009

Mr. Greenwald is covering this story like Derek Jeter at shortstop. While I don't agree with everything he say's , he say's it well.

While I don't think Israel should have to stand-by and let Hamas bomb them at will, even the people of Sderot, who are receiving most of thebombing think this is overkill. Taking out the soldiers of Hamas or even killing the leaders is one thing, killing and wounding women and children is murder.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.4

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.3
Information
4.8
Sourcing
4.2
Style
4.8
Context
4.8
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
4.5
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.1
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »