America’s Energy Predicament

In the United States, high gas prices and mammoth oil company profits have set off a new round of hand wringing in Washington. Inthis week’sinterview, Rice University energy analyst Amy Myers Jaffe explains America’s energy predicament, why more offshore drilling should be permitted, and why the oil majors are at risk of being beaten in the race toward the future.

Foreign Policy: What should be the top policy priority on energy?

Amy ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Subjects: Business, Sci/Tech
Topics: Energy, Oil and Gas, Cars
Member Tags: e85, offshore drilling, energy independence, automobiles
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 3
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Opinions as factsHelp: 4
Number stakeholdersHelp: 6
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 4
Derogatory wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - May 11, 2006 - 12:51 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: David Fox - May 12, 2006 - 2:50 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 1, 2008

Interesting interview with Rice University energy expert Amy Myers Jaffe. She presents what seems like a lucid, knowledgeble picture of our energy predicament. Her opinions are well formulated, her arguments are logical, though this interview does not give any details about her sourcing and factual evidence. I like the notion of imposing "taxes on cars based on their social cost to us as a nation." Insightful read.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Daniel Will-Harris
4.6
by Daniel Will-Harris - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an opinion piece--an interview with one person, Amy Myers Jaffe, the Wallace S. Wilson Fellow in Energy Studies at the Baker Institute Energy Forum at Rice University. She's very knowledgeable about the subject and makes it clear we need to reduce consumption, increase energy sources (including offshore drilling) and gives an informed overall opinion about what needs to be done.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Alan Rojer
2.0
by Alan Rojer - Oct. 1, 2008

One expert tiptoes around the topic of US energy profligacy; her position is captured by her opening remark: "We have to reduce the annual rate of increase in U.S. gasoline consumption." Just move those deck chairs a little to the left, please!

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Joseph Addington
2.2
by Joseph Addington - Oct. 1, 2008

The Author based everything around his/her opinion. Some good info was presented but overall it was based on their opinion. Nothing was written about environmental impacts or any opposing view. Actually, given the title it should have addressed more energy topics outside liquid forms; such as solar, wind, hydro, etc… It also lack some vital detail that may be offered by scientist; mostly because it didn’t address anything from a scientific point of view. Overall it had the feeling of a persuasive augments rather than an informational; much like he/she was using facts to support his/her opinion. Though some good points where addressed; it was not balanced what so ever; especially given the title of the article.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.5
Sourcing
2.2
Context
3.2
Popularity
2.8
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!