Was the 'Credit Crunch' a Myth Used to Sell a Trillion-Dollar Scam?

Even as the media continue to repeat the claim that credit has frozen up, evidence has emerged suggesting the entire story is wrong.

For the most part, the press has continued to echo Bush's central assertion that there's a "credit crunch" preventing even qualified borrowers -- that's the key point -- from getting loans, and it's now part of the conventional wisdom.

But a number of economists are questionioning the factual basis of the credit crunch narrative. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dwight Rousu
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 5, 2009

The article goes through the Bush economic claims one by one and finds the evidence to the contrary. Holland lays much of the blame on a compliant press that has not investigated the claims. They have pulled a TARP over their heads and hid.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Chris Finnie
3.9
by Chris Finnie - Jan. 5, 2009

This was hard to review because it did explore some new territory and present both facts and expert opinion. But it also left some out. I have seen other reports of small businesses that could not fill orders because they could not get normal business lines of credit. In fact, that was exactly the problem with the window company that shut down and triggered the pre-Christmas sit-in by workers. My son is still house hunting, but finds the pre-approved loan he had last year is no longer good because lenders are requiring a bigger down payment--even though his credit is still excellent and his job secure. So, while this report provides a counterbalance to much of the mainstream media coverage, which has--as Holland accurately ... More »

I have long asserted exactly what these economists say. People will not spend if they feel their jobs and income are not secure. More lending will not fix that. It would, however, ease the way for businesses who do depend on regular credit to factor inventories or raw materials--and who create our jobs. Too bad nobody structured TARP to protect that lending. And that it helped create even larger financial institutions that will be harder to regulate.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Gregory Kruse
5.0
by Gregory Kruse - Dec. 31, 2008

It is counter-consensual, which in this case is an asset. A consensus is the goal of all PR and propaganda. Given the consistent behavior of the power elite in skimming cream off the top of the economy, the consensus view should be highly suspect. Joshua Holland is an excellent writer and reporter. I read articles from Alternet daily. I don't give a 5.0 very often, but I have spent some time with this article, thinking and reading about the situation, and I must give it the best rating.

As this article makes clear, the rationale for TARP presented by Paulson is much less credible than the theory that its impetus is a result of simple, gleeful greed. Very exciting for those who are collecting bonuses. The effect on the other end is a desired one, drainage of wealth and power from the middle class.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
4.0
by Kenneth Sibbett - Dec. 31, 2008

A very well researched article that if true would be something Paulson and Co. would dream up to hide the deficiency's In the banking industries.

Under the strange but true section of the paper.When Mr. Holland say's the healthy banks are holding cash in anticipation pf picking up weaker banks on the cheap, that has a ring of truth to it. But what do I know?

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.1
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.8
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.5
Context
4.8
Depth
4.2
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
4.2
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!