The Net-Zero Gas Tax

Americans have a deep and understandable aversion to gasoline taxes. In a culture more single-mindedly devoted to individual freedom than any other, tampering with access to the open road is met with visceral opposition. That's why earnest efforts to alter American driving habits take the form of regulation of the auto companies--the better to hide the hand of government and protect politicians from the inevitable popular backlash.

But it's not ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin

See All Reviews »

Review

Tom Maertens
4.6
by Tom Maertens - Dec. 27, 2008

Krauthammer is going against (conservative) type here by advocating a large increase in the gas tax, but then offsetting it by lowering the payroll tax an equivalent amount. The idea is clever, and has the benefit of making the payroll tax more progressive while encouraging energy conservation. That in turn will lower the price of crude and the financial windfall that accrues to exporting nations, some of whom -- Krauthammer would say, many of whom -- do not wish us well. While Krauthammer emphasizes the geopolitical advantages of conserving oil, he goes very lightly over the fact that world oil production either has peaked or is about to peak. A post-petroleum world is likely to be very nasty; anything we can do to conserve existing stocks will ease the transition to other sources of energy, virtually all of which require cheap fossil fuel to mine/process/facilitate. Krauthammer's proposal apparently would produce a slight increase in overall revenue, as well, a boon in times of great budget deficits.

A tax at the pump is the most efficient way to achieve conservation but should be combined with a broader program of conservation and transition to a post-petroleum world.

See All Reviews »

Tom's Rating

Overall
4.6

Very good
from 7 answers
Quality
4.7
Insight
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »