Redeem yourselves, liberals, and be more charitable

This holiday season is a time to examine who's been naughty and who's been nice, but I'm unhappy with my findings. The problem is this: We liberals are personally stingy.

Liberals show tremendous compassion in pushing for generous government spending to help the neediest people at home and abroad. Yet when it comes to individual contributions to charitable causes, liberals are cheapskates.

Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins

See All Reviews »

Review

B.G. Rhule
2.4
by B.G. Rhule - Dec. 28, 2008

Caution: WARNING! WARNING! "L" word used in introductory paragraph! Be on the lookout for conservative and/or conservative thought process! My first question upon reading this piece is this: When was the last time my politics was brought into question when I donated money, time, clothing, food or toys, to the poor, which my family does on a regular basis? Who among us was ever asked our political leanings when donating time at a soup kitchen or helping our church or community group assistt the poor? Answer: Never. Result: instant invalidation of author's premise. We do not know the politics of charitable donors, nor should we. Charity, be it any denomination or persuasion is a personal devotion of time or money that has nothing to do with how liberal or conservative one is in the polling booth. Frankly, I have read this publication predominantly for Pac-10 sports updates and stories, yet i highly doubt whether it will be among my first choices for politics. In fact, knowing how pervasive the northwest support was for Barack Obama, I doubt whether many in the Seattle area read it. either. Possibly the worst journalistic endeavor I have seen since Rush Limbaugh wrote a column. Then, again, when I finally muddled through to the end, and noted that Kristol wrote it, I just shook my head. Number one rule in elementary statistics, a requirement in any credentialed graduate school in America, is to question the validity of data. If Kristol believes that simply because someone has published a book it validates their findings, then the NYT seriously needs to rethink his abysmal year of tenure with their newspaper.

See All Reviews »

B.G.'s Rating

Overall
2.4

Poor
from 6 answers
Quality
2.3
Insight
2.0
Style
2.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.5
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »