Redeem yourselves, liberals, and be more charitable

This holiday season is a time to examine who's been naughty and who's been nice, but I'm unhappy with my findings. The problem is this: We liberals are personally stingy.

Liberals show tremendous compassion in pushing for generous government spending to help the neediest people at home and abroad. Yet when it comes to individual contributions to charitable causes, liberals are cheapskates.

Arthur Brooks, the author of a book on donors to ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Dwight Rousu
3.1
by Dwight Rousu - Dec. 28, 2008

I do not trust Kristof's statistical analysis on this one. I think he needs a couple of additional analyses and opinions here.

If the Republican party is the party of the white and wealthy and there is a large proportion of the progressives who are poor and minorities, why would one not expect conservatives to have a lot more money and a larger percentage of their income available for charity? For example, the current Forbes article claims the poor give a higher percentage of their income than the rich. And Kristof does not separate out the super-rich here, which could be distorting the data.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabrice Florin
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Dec. 29, 2008

Insightful opinion that challenges the common perception that liberals are more charitable than conservatives. The author provides factual evidence from multiple sources to support his point, which seems well reasoned, with good context to explain some of the nuances behind the raw data.

This article was an eye-opener for me -- and a helpful nudge to give generously in a year where charitable donations mean more than ever for social causes.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Walter Cox
3.6
by Walter Cox - Dec. 29, 2008

A refreshingly honest assessment of the facts regarding charitable donations--liberals who vote for measures dispensing public funds (read funds collected through taxation) tend to feel that they have already "given at the office". and are thus disinclined to part with more of their personal funds. A more relevant tfocus might be an assessment ,not just of the dollar amount of liberal/conservative donations, but their relative effectiveness. The question becomes, "Dollar-for-dollar do carefully targeted personal donations on the part of conservatives do more good than liberal-supported dispensations of public monies?"

This opinion piece mirrors every other study I have read on the same topic. All of those studies show that liberals favor governmental, rather than personal, solutions to problems. Governmental solutions tend to be shotgun approaches that throw money at various problems--money raised by increasing taxes disproportionately paid by non-liberals. A good example might be the trillions spent since 1965 on our "War on Poverty": Conservatives would argue, and I tend to agree, that ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Peter L. Combs
4.1
by Peter L. Combs - Dec. 28, 2008

The author does a good job of naming sources, presenting statistics in context and along ehe way dispells common misbeliefs. A very timely article.

As a socially liberal but political and financial conservative I found the article to reflect what I had seen anecdotally in my own life while doing regular charity and volunteer fundraising work. Strong conservatives have in my experience here in Massachusetts are ALWAYS the biggest check writers and the most willing to give of time and overall assistance.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Randy Morrow
3.6
by Randy Morrow - Dec. 28, 2008

In contrasting the giving levels of liberals vs. conservatives it would seem to be a serious omission not to include in the equation the income levels of the compared groups in order to give an accurate picture of who is able to give. For example: did "conservatives" as a group have more disposable income (as compared to "liberals") at the time this article was written therefore giving them the ability to donate more? That kind of a question is not answered in this story.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Dec. 27, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
B.G. Rhule
2.4
by B.G. Rhule - Dec. 28, 2008

Caution: WARNING! WARNING! "L" word used in introductory paragraph! Be on the lookout for conservative and/or conservative thought process! My first question upon reading this piece is this: When was the last time my politics was brought into question when I donated money, time, clothing, food or toys, to the poor, which my family does on a regular basis? Who among us was ever asked our political leanings when donating time at a soup kitchen or helping our church or community group assistt the poor? Answer: Never. Result: instant invalidation of author's premise. We do not know the politics of charitable donors, nor should we. Charity, be it any denomination or persuasion is a personal devotion of time or money that has ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 10 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Information
2.9
Insight
3.4
Style
3.2
Balance
2.0
Context
3.3
Enterprise
3.4
Expertise
2.9
Originality
3.5
Relevance
3.5
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.1
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Who Gives The Most?

    () Americans give more to charity, per capita and as a percentage of gross domestic product, than the citizens of other nations. But why? It would be nice to believe that as a ...
    Posted by Fabrice Florin