Very superficial treatment. The reporter barely goes beyond the speech in question to see what the whole thing was about. Various aspects of the national immigration debate are mentioned, but nothing is thoroughly explained.

This story is extremely one-sided. Adding select quotes from President Obama does not make for a factual or fair argument and, for me, equates with lazy journalism. I would love to see less articles fueling partisan politics and showcasing silly accusations.

This news analysis is poor journalism. The author accepts the statements by President Obama at face value, like a press release from the Democratic National Committee. There is no presentation of the Republican viewpoint, not even the fact that THEY passed the amnesty program under President Reagan, not the Democrats. Nor the fact that Republicans are likely to get their largest share of the Hispanic vote ever, with favored Hispanic candidates such as for Senator in Florida and Governor in New Mexico.

Here is a story that does NOT reflect very good journalism. It's a story basically documenting what President Obama said to the Hispanic Caucus Institute. The writer's purpose was to reinforce the stereotypes that in order to reach Hispanics you have say a little Spanish and tell them to hang in there because we (the Democrats) are with you and the they (the Republicans) are not. One could be offended by what was said. But, I would suggest the Associate Press staff was not very enterprising in looking for reaction comments on other anything beyond the predictable.

if you were just looking for an account of what the president said, this would be an OK story. But there were no comments from others and to me that was lacking in the story.