The articles describes some of the terrorism victims in CST in Mumbai - the train terminus that attracted far less media attention than "posh" tourist locations such as the Taj hotel. The writer mostly tells the other side(s) of the story, calmly and with evidence from interviews. I recommend this piece because it brings out aspects and people of the Mumbai attacks that are rarely seen in the mainstream media coverage.

this is important journalism as it captures a part of a major story not usually told. the story is told dispassionately yet effectively shows the difference in both the people who were effected and how the usual media differentiates in stories they tell. i'm sorry this picture of the tragedy doesn't have a wider media audience here.

Because of the lack of coverage by other sources it is difficult to determine the validity of the article, but there is every reason to believe it is correct,

For a story focused on exposing a deficiency of coverage of the attacks at the CST, I was looking for more concrete examples. The images conjured of middle class masses laying gorgeous wreaths at the Taj were compelling, but I wanted to see that tied into mainstream media coverage and global media coverage. It is otherwise written with a strong sense of purpose, and is certainly a worthy topic.

Of all the stories I've read about in the days after this most terrible incident , this was the most heartbreaking.