Is Barack Obama's idea-gathering website just for show?

The incoming Obama administration's Internet solicitation of voters' advice could signal a push for e-democracy. Or it could be just a gimmick.

Want to join a policy debate? Your e-mail will appear on change.gov. Readers then rate your submission using icons whose thumbs are up or down. Submissions that are deemed the best rise to the top of the screen.

To proponents, these efforts by Obama's team to build a Web-based network of support can democratize the government anew. To skeptics, however, change.gov is little more than a clever public-relations device, a way to keep Obama's fans ... Full Story »

Posted by Dale Penn

See All Reviews »

Review

Derek Hawkins
3.0
by Derek Hawkins - Dec. 12, 2008

An interesting but underdeveloped attempt to explore Obama's so-called "e-democracy" on the new change.gov Web site. To be expected, those optimistic about this type of civic networking are given space high up to deliver their platitudes (see quotes, please). The Republican consultant was an intriguing choice, and well qualified to comment on how this new "openness" could affect future administrations. The skeptical side of this story, however, was less represented than I thought it would be -- or perhaps not elaborated upon enough. Save a quick quote at the end, there's no discussion of how to make the site appeal to the less tech-savvy, or how to make it functional for the poor who still use dial-up or have no home Internet connection. And the quote from the one supposed "skeptic" -- and this is a silly way to attribute the speaker here -- doesn't reflect any real skepticism that readers can tell, as this quote could have just as easily come from a supporter. Unfair? I wouldn't go that far. Just unsophisticated.

Change.gov is obviously fantastic … Just the idea that the president-elect is soliciting ideas from outside the traditional pool is a profound potential change.

Could the author really not elicit a more insightful quote than this, essentially a reiteration of Change.gov’s mission statement?

See All Reviews »

Derek's Rating

Overall
3.0

Average
from 12 answers
Quality
2.8
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.0
Enterprise
2.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »