Facebook's Face Plant: The Poverty of Social Networks and the Death of Web 2.0

It is safe now to say that "Web 2.0" is dead. The evidence is irrefutable and it exposes the twin fallacies the concept of Web 2.0 has depended upon: 1) that people can build their worlds around - indeed, will want to build their worlds around - social networking; and 2) that social networking offers a viable, massively scalable business model. Full Story »

Posted by Jim Wilkerson
Tags Help
Subjects: Media
Topics: Social Networks
Member Tags: social media, web2.0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Jim Wilkerson - Dec 10, 2008 - 7:44 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Jim Wilkerson - Dec 10, 2008 - 7:44 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Matt Collette
2.4
by Matt Collette - Dec. 12, 2008

I think the author spends too much time talking about a few people he knows who use Facebook, and could be mistaking that for real data. I think the author also errs by making overly broad statements, like that Web 2.0 sites cannot maintain thei focus. Instead, a bigger issue may be that Web 2.0 isn't what people expected it to be, and this author is holding sites like Facebook and Flickr to the standards set a few years ago of what social networking sits could be. By focusing on that, I think he misses what they have become.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Jim Wilkerson
3.5
by Jim Wilkerson - Dec. 10, 2008

Well written for what it is: an opinion. But many/most of the statistics from which the writer's opinion is drawn are feeble and far from scientific. A statement like "Kids are turning off to Facebook." based on the the experience of his son and a straw poll of 15 of his friends while slightly interesting, are hardly theorems from which Zuckerburg will be making strategic plans.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.7

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Information
2.0
Insight
2.3
Style
3.0
Context
3.3
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
3.0
Popularity
2.3
Recommendation
2.0
Credibility
2.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!