Pakistan's president, Asif Ali Zardari, must face up to his country's involvement - whether official or nearly so. We know his new civilian government is weak, and he may not be able to accede to New Delhi's demands that all suspects be turned over to India for prosecution. Full Story »
Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Meaningless recommendations, even coming from the IHT. The Jammu and Kashmir dispute is far too deep and complex to be "settled" in the wake of the attacks, and it amounts to little for the IHT to suggest so here. I knocked this for relevance not based on the topic but for the overall impact of the piece.
The paper oversimplifies the issue here. This could be misleading to someone unfamiliar with the history of India-Pakistan relations. This is not some little border dispute that can be dealt with through straight talk; nor are the attacks and the circumstances that led to them akin to 9/11, but are part of a history of violence from both sides.
Check out the Global Pulse video on this, showing how different TV news around the world are covering the issue. Watch it here: http://www.linktv.org/video/3405 <object width="400" height="370"><param name="movie" value="http://www.linktv.org/embed/globalpulse/globalpulse20081211"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.linktv.org/embed/globalpulse/globalpulse20081211" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="400" ...="" <a="" href="/stories/32688/reviews/83378" class="more_url">More »
Retrieving Comments
