Some examples, please! It's not very effective to say China's going to invest in "essential green infrastructure" and have readers accept it on its face. This piece is entirely too credulous. The writer, a director at the World Resources Institute's Climate, Energy and Pollution Program in Beijing, is invested in the predictions she makes about Chinese energy policy, and the conflict of interest is stark. Moreover, since she's writing from Beijing, would it not have been dangerous for her to write something more critical? Not recommended.

Some solid information here with good links. The hypothesis being that the economic downturn, in combination with China's directed economic stimulus, is an overall net positive on the climate change issue. Fails to discuss alternatives (if at all) in the use of coal for electricity production.