Economic rescue could cost $8.5 trillion

With its decision last week to pump an additional $1 trillion into the financial crisis, the government eliminated any doubt that the nation is on a wartime footing in the battle to shore up the economy. The strategy now -- and in the coming Obama administration -- is essentially the win-at-any-cost approach previously adopted only to wage a major war.

And that means no hesitation in pledging to spend previously almost unimaginable sums of money ... Full Story »

Posted by Leo Romero
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Leo Romero - Nov 30, 2008 - 8:34 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Leo Romero - Nov 30, 2008 - 8:34 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 30, 2008

Informative report on the historic efforts by the U.S. government to forestall a depression -- and the unprecedented costs such a rescue might entail. Well researched, with solid factual evidence and insights from multiple sources on what all the bailouts really mean for American taxpayers.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
4.0
by Kenneth Sibbett - Dec. 1, 2008

While all the numbers were put together in a neat little row, there was no there, there.

If the United States has to treat this problem like a war, the rest of the world should also treat this like World War 111

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Leo Romero
3.0
by Leo Romero - Nov. 30, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
M. Simon
3.9
by M. Simon - Nov. 30, 2008

This story is pretty good but it leaves out one important word. Stagflation.

I think this story leaves out one important effect that we saw the last time this sort of thing was tried in the Carter administration. Stagflation. It led to the Reagan win in the 1980 election followed by the recession of 1982. And what did Reagan do that ultimately got us out of the Carter mess? He lowered tax rates and convinced the Federal Reserve to stop expanding the money supply. The Milton Friedman solution. Or supply side economics as it was called at the time. Now much ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
3.8
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
3.0
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!