Jennings to Congress: Vote machines `malfunctioned'

Christine Jennings filed a request for Congress to investigate Sarasota County's recent election.

The dispute over the congressional seat once held by Rep. Katherine Harris landed in the nation's Capitol on Wednesday, with Democrat Christine Jennings asking Congress to investigate ''pervasive malfunctioning'' of Sarasota's voting machines, and possibly order a second election. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: Election Reform
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Dec 21, 2006 - 10:35 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Terri Adams
3.9
by Terri Adams - Oct. 1, 2008

It needs to be more specific about the missing 18,000 votes, but it is good to call attention to our faulty voting machines and how there must be a way to monitor them.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Mike LaBonte
3.5
by Mike LaBonte - Oct. 1, 2008

Dos not discuss the common theory that poor ballot design caused the undervotes. Otherwise, this article is well sourced and accurate.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Laura Perkins
3.6
by Laura Perkins - Oct. 1, 2008

This is an important topic, reflecting on the integrity, or lack thereof, of our elections. The story is, unfortunately, short on investigative journalism. Repeating the Republican claim that there is no evidence that the machines malfunctioned is a bit of "he said, she said" journalism, substituting competing spin for facts. The fact is there is indisputable evidence that votes were lost by the machines. There are statistics out there that the reporter could have cited to prove this, but instead they went for the false "balance" to which the media so often succumbs.

See Full Review » (9 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Oct. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
2.7
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.5
Sourcing
3.7
Style
3.5
Accuracy
4.5
Balance
3.3
Context
3.3
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
3.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!