Children Who Live in Public Housing Suffer in School, Study Says

New York City children who live in public housing perform worse in school than students who live in other types of housing, according to a study by New York University researchers. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S., Education
Topics: Poverty, High School
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Nov 24, 2008 - 12:51 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Nov 24, 2008 - 12:51 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Derek Hawkins
3.8
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 24, 2008

This story is well rounded and contains some solid reporting that goes beyond the NYU study that is the central focus. Avoids the common mistake of study reporting and seeks third-party perspectives, students and city officials among them.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kristin Gorski
3.7
by Kristin Gorski - Nov. 24, 2008

Insightful article about a newly released landmark study which looks at connections between educational success and living in NYC public housing. While the study is criticized by Housing authority officials and even the study's backers say it doesn't give enough answers, the reporter uses it as a prompt to interview teens who are succeeding at school and explains why they are succeeding.

It's well known that poverty, crime and instability at home affect school performance. More energy (and studies?) need to be put into finding concrete solutions to help children and their families in poverty, instead of another study done to confirm what we all know.

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Kaizar Campwala
3.6
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 24, 2008
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Marge Baxter
3.0
by Marge Baxter - Nov. 24, 2008

It was an article that held no suprises. I like how the reporter gave us the what the findings suggested, and did not conclude it for the reader. Kind of boring subject matter.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.4
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.7
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.3
Depth
3.3
Enterprise
3.3
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!