Green-sky proposal

Tackle air-quality issues and you tackle health-care reform

The drag of poor air quality on the economy is mounting, costing the state of California alone close to $30 billion per year and, if my own reckoning is somewhat accurate, about six percent of total U.S. gross domestic product, or about $700 billion, a figure that should sound pretty familiar.
China, which just this year surpassed the U.S. in carbon emissions, or pollution, on a total tonnage basis, figures its poor air quality costs it 5.8% of GDP ... Full Story »

Posted by Marsha Iverson

See All Reviews »

Review

Marsha Iverson
4.2
by Marsha Iverson - Nov. 19, 2008

Kostigen connects the problems of air pollution, health care, and economic recovery in this thoughtful analysis, suggesting that the incoming administration can build its own trifecta of success by linking the solutions.

It's time we recognized that environmental quality is the new industrial/economic niche we've been looking for: tie the overhaul of the failed automotive industry to new jobs and new investments in alternative technologies. We're already at the point where everything we know is wrong. How 'bout we use this crisis to expedite our leap into the next--the Green--Industrial Revolution?

These are the hard facts of pollution and environmental degradation. We can talk nice about policy and politics and programs, but it’s the affects on people with which we should be most concerned. Those are losses we should not stand for. Increasing fuel efficiency, mitigating pollution and demanding better air quality are actions that should be undertaken immediately: They are life saving as well as cost saving. So here’s where Barack Obama can become a genius: link any auto industry bailout to increased fuel efficiency and therefore better pollution standards. Not only will he save an industry and jobs, he will set an example for other business sectors.

We will pay for whatever choice we make, one way or the other. Why not solve three problems at once and take an educated chance at a happy ending for all?

See All Reviews »

Marsha's Rating

Overall
4.2

Good
from 14 answers
Quality
4.2
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
3.0
More How our ratings work »