Appointing Hillary secretary of state would be so un-Clintonian

There are Obama aides and supporters who are upset that The One who won on change has ushered in deja vu all over again. The man who vowed to deliver us from 28 years of Bushes and Clintons has been stocking up on Clintonites.

How, one may ask, can he put Hillary -- who voted to authorize the Iraq war without even reading the intelligence assessment -- in charge of patching up a foreign policy and a world riven by that war? Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Nov 18, 2008 - 5:54 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Nov 18, 2008 - 5:54 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Randy Morrow
3.5
by Randy Morrow - Nov. 21, 2008

I like Ms. Dowd's writing but I have frequently been confused (as I was by this piece) about her feelings toward the Clintons. Does she really despise/hate them or not?

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
4.5
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 21, 2008

The opinion is written with ironic humor and insight. Whether you agree or disagree, the facets exposed are interesting.

I think there are better nominees than a pro-war senator for secretary of state. It sounds like good politics and poor policy.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
4.5
Context
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!